Tag: Favorite Podcasts

My efforts to make this a monthly blog where I review podcasts have so far failed. Nevertheless, better occasional than never. So here’s a few of the podcasts I’ve listened to over recent months that I enjoyed for one reason or another.

MOI Global – This Week in Intelligent Investing

Format: Conversational/Roundtable

The stock market is in an interesting place. While last year saw a recession and of course a pandemic, the government and federal response effectively reversed the bear market and sent stock to new all-time highs by last summer, a run that continued through the start of 2021. That, along with a lot more time on people’s hands, stimulus dollars going to people who didn’t need them quite as much or who wanted to gamble/have fun, and many other entertainment options shutting down led to a ton of new investors in the market.

There have also been a ton of new podcasts as well, as people look for guidance or entertainment along with their investing. Podcasts also fit in well to business models that are relevant in financial content, whether subscriptions, memberships, communities, or what have you.

This Week in Intelligent Investing launched last summer, and not having remembered that, I am surprised it’s only been around that long. Hosted by John Mihaljevic, chairman of Manual of Ideas (MOI), the show is sort of like the old ESPN Sports Reporters program for the markets. Mihaljevic hosts, both organizing the episodes and contributing with his take, while the panel of guests each bring a topic for discussion. These are not off the cuff efforts, and it’s clear each host has prepared for what they want to say. It gives enough structure to anchor each episode while also affording room for each person on the episode to respond, riff, etc.

One thing interesting from an investing perspective is that the host/guests are all investment professionals in some form or another, and the takeaway I usually infer from the episodes I listen to is that investing isn’t easy, i.e. there’s a great deal of uncertainty out there and investors have to manage that. I would imagine its audience skews towards professional or fuller-time investors, and the conversation is suited for it. Mentioning that because the next show takes a different approach.

7investing – The 7investing Podcast

Format: Conversational/Roundtable

7Investing launched in March 2020; again, I’m surprised it’s a new podcast as the host/panel seems to be very comfortable in the format. That format is also a roundtable conversation. The host – usually Dan Kline – does more of the work in terms of introducing the topics, and the conversations are more quick hit, pass the mic around affairs. It’s enjoyable, and targeted more towards people in the beginning of their investing careers. Which is interesting in part because part of the dynamic over the last year or two is that beginning investors who are picking fast growing companies are doing well, no matter how expensive those companies become (in relative terms to how much money they make).

7Investing has a subscription service, and brings that to the forefront of their show somewhat regularly, in the place of having an advertiser. They do occasional interviews, but more of the episodes I’ve heard are in the conversational format. Some of the shows appear to be livestreamed – they publish almost daily, as far as I can tell – and are useful as a way to build community among their subscribers.

My sense from listening is that 7Investing’s their aim is to make investing appear approachable and simpler than it seems. Which, there is something to that – if you are looking to control your own finances, have money saved that you can invest, are looking to a longer-term horizon, can be patient when things go bad, etc., investing can be relatively simple. The recent period has been a weird one that has rewarded just about every sort of investor, and there’s a risk (likelihood?) that some of them – including new ones – will be hurt as the environment changes.

But, I guess part of why I’m lining these two podcasts up is to highlight the value of figuring out/cultivating one’s audience, and making sure the content matches that audience.

Futuro Media – In the Thick

Format: Conversational

Speaking of conversational…In The Thick is produced by Futuro Media – which also produces Latino USA, a public radio stalwart and one of the first ‘podcasts’ I started regularly listening to a few years ago. In the Thick is a more casual affair. I started listening in the wake of the election, looking to confront or dissipate the disappointment over the mixed result for Democrats and get context on all the discussion around the Latin@ vote. The perspective both from the hosts – Maria Hinojosa, a legend herself and a leading journalist, and Julio Ricardo Varela – and guests who held local insight in places like Arizona and Georgia – was very valuable in that context and just in general. Living out of the states, and being in mostly white or conventional liberal bubbles when I’m there, I find myself sort of perceiving ‘The Discourse’ without really being immersed in it (which, by the way, it has always been such a privilege to be able to exist in the world without running into cable TV news randomly on). I’d like to get beyond the Twitter bubble, and I’m not always sure In The Thick steps out of that, but at the very least it’s informing the listener from a different angle.

And, just as relevantly, it’s always entertaining as well. Can’t miss the no pendejas (no bullshit) segment.

Sway

Format: Interview

Kara Swisher is another one of the biggest names in journalism, and this is a power play, literally. The ambit of the show is to explore power, and it allows her to do a bunch of timely news things, like speaking to the CEO of Parler – in an interview cited in Amazon’s letter booting Parler off of Amazon Web Services – or more cultural zeitgeist topics, like interviewing Brene Brown. It’s hard to break fresh ground with a lot of these figures, because they have what they want to say hardwired into their brains, but it’s still a model of interviewing all the same.

And what’s interesting to note about this is the role a podcast can play in our media landscape. In the past you might have magazine profiles, or television interviews – Katie Couric or the weekly programs like those hosted by Barbara Walters come to mind – but relatively long and substantive conversations with important people from all fields, it’s perfect for the podcast format and also sort of amazing that it’s happening on a podcast. I don’t know what the listenership is like, though a New York Times home page spot is not a bad top of funnel to get ears for a show, and the types of guests she’s had – I’ve listened to episodes with Killer Mike, Nancy Pelosi, Lina Khan, Dara Khosrowshahi, and John Fetterman – show that at least her guests are taking this seriously.

The Promise

Format: Documentary/Reporting

I listened to season 1 of the Promise in September, right around the same time I listened to Nice White Parents and Fiasco. That timing was a coincidence; I was interested in The Promise because I was looking for local city reporting, not necessarily public education. But Season 2, which came out this fall, was on public schools in Nashville, leading to it being lumped in with the other two shows. I finally got around to listening to Season 2 towards the end of the year.

Season 1 focuses on the renewal efforts for the Cayce housing projects, a public housing neighborhood in East Nashville, a gentrifying part of a gentrifying city. Someone I know recently bought a house nearby and that was enough of a hook for me. I found the show fascinating, full of surprise turns, interesting issues, and colorful characters.

It raised questions to, on a production level. On the one hand, there is a gap between the quality of production on Nice White Parents and Fiasco, though that’s not that important. I found the perspective more challenging, and I say this imagining myself in the same challenging spot were I to host a show like this. Meribah Knight comes off as a well-meaning, earnest reporter, earlier in her career than not, and white, reporting on a Black neighborhood. All that’s fine, and I think she does a good job, but there are times where people got set up as characters, such as Big Man or Miss Vernell, and seemed to fill ‘classic’ roles or types. It’s part of the tension of telling a story about real people, but also there is something about the dynamics of who is telling the story and how.

That said, season 2 is a big leap, the way that, say, a band will release a promising debut and then follow it up with a fantastic second album. The production is more polished both in sound/music and in telling the story. But even more, Knight seems much more confident in how she tells the story. She takes on a clear viewpoint. Her perspective as a parent who will face decisions about where her child goes to elementary school may invest her with more of a stake. And then within the broader (presumably coincidental) context of the other education/integration-oriented podcasts, this provides a well-reported, historically rooted context and example on how integration is falling apart in a U.S. city. And then to have an episode on the COVID period makes it all the more relevant and powerful.

There are touches of awkwardness around constructing a story, mostly in the elevating of people into the role of characters, like BJ, the 4^th grader who was putting it together in school before the pandemic hit. But Knight makes clear that it’s not just her who’s worried about someone like BJ, it’s the adults around him.

Moby Dick Energy

Format: Deep dive/Conversational

I live outside of the U.S., and have for many a year. I dreamed once of being a journalist, and to my surprise I’ve had a career that is sort of adjacent to journalism, but I’m not quite sure I can call myself a man of the pen, or the keyboard, or even the microphone. And beyond that, I live outside of whatever bubble I might aspire towards, whatever social circles or networks. Not that I can claim a full lament, I’ve been very lucky in many ways, but sometimes I look across the ocean, digital or physical, and think of what is out there, what might have been, if I had dared in other ways.

In this pandemic year, above keeping ourselves safe and virus free the hierarchy of needs has flowed to how to stay sane and then how to spend the time that we weren’t spending in the world, with other people, or otherwise. One of the things many people did – I did – was read classic books, like Moby Dick. Another of the things many people did – I did – was launch podcasts. Finding solace in our own and others’ voices, and in the tales of yore, it’s a common ground, an escape and a reminder of the mess we find ourselves in at the same time.

Moby Dick Energy, a podcast hosted by another leading journalist, Talia Lavin, is a study in what a podcast can be. It is, for one, not always of high fidelity, except for its theme song which is of the highest quality one can ask for (the cover art is pretty great as well). The sound of the conversation quakes, there are pauses and filler words kept, there is – at least in the first six episodes, which I confess is all I have gotten through so far, in part because I’m not sure whether it’s best to re-read the newly read Moby Dick, or whether it even matters – a sense of Lavin still working out how she wants to lead or direct a conversation, with left turns away from the guest’s momentum, or restatements of a point.

And yet, all of these surface level things don’t matter, because at its heart, the podcast demonstrates what a podcast can be. Digressive, silly, profound, patient, and stretched out, it dives into one of the foundational works of American literature and exposes it for its relevance and also for how funny and weird it is. It’s sort of like how everybody talks about Kafka laughing when he read his work in public, and how no, actually, you’re not smart enough for not getting the humor; except that in this case everyone is in on the joke except maybe Melville, and it makes the book’s (and thus the podcast’s) ambition even grander for tackling a whaling voyage to the depths.

Lavin is also connected to other smart people and many of them; I chortled throughout the first episode with the David Roth of Defector, and scanning the guest list to come, I find a number of impressive heads, err, names that she has managed to bring on. A sense of community, of embarking on a voyage together from around the world, isn’t that the best of what a podcast does? And most remarkable, perhaps, is that the show set off before the pandemic hit, even though it seems like the most perfect response to the pandemic in its way.

***

That’s it for the full reviews. I hope you check some of them out and enjoy them and maybe get some ideas for how to make your own podcasts, or how to make them better. A few other shows I’ve listened to recently and have enjoyed / am enjoying include KRCW’s Lost Notes, iHeart Radio’s Forgotten: The Women of Juarez, Chicano Squad, and Anything for Selena. I might go over them next time, we’ll see.

I’m a month behind on podcast reviews, so to catch up this covers both September and October. Between work, less travel, and what I was curious about, I listened more to ‘prestige’ podcasts, bigger name podcasts from professional studios that have set the standards for audio content one way or another.

Since I’m drifting into the heavyweight and middleweight categories for podcasts, I thought it would be worth highlighting not only what works or what questions I have, but how they validate (or don’t) the format of podcasts. A lot of complaints about podcasts come down to ‘I’d rather read when I have my own time’. I prefer reading to other ways of consuming ideas.

But there is power to the spoken voice that goes beyond ‘something I can listen to when I’m not able to read.’ So I’m considering these seven podcasts in part from that lens, of how the podcast format helps or doesn’t help the story or conversation the hosts are trying to relay.

Wondery – Business Wars

Type of podcast: Storytelling

Episodes listened to: full season on the Pizza Wars

Links: Apple | Spotify

Wondery is one of the biggest independent podcast studios out there – per their site, the biggest. This is the first podcast I’ve listened to from them. Business Wars retells classic business rivalries in a narrative fashion with a little more focus on the personalities involved than the minutiae of business strategy, though there’s a fair portion of the latter. Just glancing at what they’ve done in the second half of this year, those rivalries include the diamond business, dating apps, FedEx vs. UPS, wine, jeans, and the season I listened to, the pizza wars.

I’ve talked about Domino’s once on The Razor’s Edge, and the pizza chain is the one American chain I will occasionally break down and order from abroad (mostly in Bulgaria – you could get a pizza for about 5-6 euros all with their delivery tracking). I knew some of the contours of the company’s history, especially the revolution over the last 10 years, but the overall picture and their rivalry with Pizza Hut was new to me.

Business Wars takes an interesting approach. The host, Dave Brown, reads the story through, and will voice the different characters. I suppose this is close to old-time radio theater, but I found it a little weird. Especially since there were not a ton of hard and firm quotations, as I understood it; the approach really centered on historical reproduction. The exceptions came as we got to the last episode or two, where the famous commercials of Domino’s admitting their pizza stinks are quoted directly.

At the same time, I kept listening. The show did a nice job of serializing the story, so that each episode felt full but also left enough of a cliff-hanger for the next episode. And the narrative itself was compelling and well-pitched: the story went shallower than a book would, but it tied enough together to deliver new information along with being entertaining. This level of depth sometimes betrayed the narrative, as in references to other competitors in the Pizza Wars (John Schnatter, a.k.a. Papa John’s, shows up for about half an episode, starting in a dumpster outside of a Domino’s (or Pizza Hut, I can’t recall). But I think they struck the right balance, especially when you consider the volume of new seasons the show turns out; that volume decision may explain some of these other aesthetic or narrative decisions more than anything else.

Stock Detective Podcast

Type of podcast: Conversation

Episodes listened to: #1 and #3

Links: Apple | Spotify

One of the side effects of 2020 has been a surge of interest in investing. The type of investing that has worked most is growth investing; investing in more expensive stocks (at least on the surface) that appear to have more promising prospects for the years and decades ahead, especially in tech. (Quickly, an opposing school is value investing, which theoretically entails buying companies that are less expensive compared to their earnings power, because there is more uncertainty about their prospects. The one sentence version of growth investing certainly sounds more attractive, and has been borne out in the stock market over the past 5-10 years! Of course, I tend more to the opposing school.)

Combine growing interest in growth investing, often expressed through twitter in the ‘fintwit’ (financial twitter) community, and the growing salience of podcasts, and it’s no surprise that more podcasts are popping up in the investing space (this goes for value investing podcasts, by the way, and I may focus more on the sector next time). Stock Detective Podcast is a good representative of these trends.

Hosted by Kermit Capital – someone I follow and chat with on Twitter – and Dhaval Kotecha, the show looks at growth investing from the perspective of people who have worked in tech and who are public and transparent about how they invest. The show has only had three episodes so far – an ask me anything debut, an interview with another growth fintwit member, and a deep dive into Amazon. They use a hybrid video (with slideshow)/podcast model, and have been doing well on Youtube, it appears.

What the podcast format adds is an ability to talk around more sides of a problem than twitter or even written work can do. Their Amazon review was thorough and exhaustive, and I appreciated the rounded approach they took. I asked a question that they read on the air – basically, how does Amazon fit into an ethical investing framework – and I thought they handled all sides of that question.

I’m a believer in more voices, more investors, more podcasts, and more thoughtful discussion, so it’s good to see this podcast. It stands in for some of the trneds I mentioned above, and a good way to connect with people in this growing space.

Belén Montalvo: Aló Miami: Desmitificando EE.UU

Type of podcast: Deep Dive

Episodes listened to: #17, part of #19, and #20

Links: Apple | Spotify

EE.UU is Spanish for the United States. Belén Montalvo is a Spaniard living in the states. I believe, but am not sure, that her podcast grew out of instagramming and blogging about being a foreigner in the states. Having been on the other side of that story in Spain and elsewhere, and having discovered this podcast on the Spotify charts (which are dominated by radio outlets and Podium Podcast), I thought it was worth a listen.

Aló Miami a Spanish-language podcast, for starters. I was expecting an interview podcast, maybe something a little more madcap, not quite Borat roaming the country but a little bit more digging into the country through speaking to people. The show is more of a deep dive, though, where the host does a good deal of research on a given topic and then reports it back. I heard an occasional gimmick – for one, she refers to her partner as the yankimarido (the Yankee husband) – but she plays it pretty straight.

This works really well in some cases; I found the podcast on why we call ourselves Americans instead of another moniker informative even from the American standpoint. Likewise, I was aware QAnon was a hive of ridiculousness but hadn’t dug into it; hearing it from Montalvo’s perspective was both entertaining and embarrassing (as my friend said after the 2016 election: I weep for my country, bro). On the other episode I listened to, on Silicon Valley, it fell a little flat. Perhaps there was too much to cover for that episode.

Anyway, for anyone who speaks Spanish and wants a learning outsider’s view of the US, this is worth a listen. And the podcast format allows Montalvo to connect with the listener and to put a little more spin on some of the more curious aspects of the States.

Serial/NY Times: Nice White Parents

Type of podcast: Reporting/Documentary

Episodes listened to: Full season (5 episodes)

Links: Apple | Spotify

With respect to the previous podcasts – especially Business Wars, which might protest most – when I referred to prestige podcasts I mostly meant the remaining three. Nice White Parents was the first production out of Serial – the studio credited with accelerating the podcast boom due to its work on S-Town and its eponymous podcast – after the New York Times bought out the studio. The Times promoted the podcast aggressively on its website, and the show had real reporting muscle, editing polish, and a timely topic to cover.

The show is hosted by Chana Joffe-Walt. When I think of the advantages of this being a podcast, a lot of it comes from her hosting. She’s able to position herself as a part of the audience as well as the host, a knowing white parent in New York who is reporting on her class. It’s not exactly an ironic distance, but sort of a ‘can you believe things work like this’ gossipy friend crossed with a mirror on her audience. She translates grim and sometimes complicated concepts into a friendly conversation.

The show focuses on the ups and downs of one school building in New York as it is built in the 1960s and then houses different types of schools, sometimes at the same time, through the years.  The things she gets people to say on tape are amazing, especially when directly contrasted with the historical record, including letters they wrote decades ago.

I do think the questions raised in Nicholas Quah’s review of the show are fair; i.e. the narrow narrative lens into one schoolbuilding works, but is also matched by a fairly narrow vocal lens, with mostly white parents speaking to white parents. I wonder, especially with the way the podcast ends – a hopeful counterexample – if this lets the audience off the hook, as if we now understand the problem but won’t actually do anything to solve it. That’s a very 2020 challenge in the wake of the antiracist literature and all the rest.

But as a podcast, this series is exemplary in so many ways. The theme music slaps, and the use of music throughout the episodes is great. The research that went into the podcast – this is the product of several years of work – truly shows up in the narrative. Joffe-Walt’s voice is great, and despite the concerns above, I think the positioning as a friend in the know works well. When I played this for my wife, a teacher and not a huge podcast listener, she kept shouting back to Chana in dismay or bafflement.

And most of all, I come back to the last 12 minutes of episode 1. The episode has seen a group of white parents set upon a mostly Black and Latino and Arabic middle school, instituting a dual language French program and developing big-money fundraising capabilities, but geared only towards that program. Which brings us to the end of the episode, a gala at the French Consulate on the Upper East Side, far from the school’s Brooklyn neighborhood. And there’s a woman, Barbara, who just, I can’t imagine capturing her Barbara-ness in an article or a book the same way as her voice, and I can’t imagine her unleashing sa francais quite as much on camera. Joffe-Walt knows she has something good, she says “I enjoy when a person likes to talk, when you can just get on their ride, sit back.” That sitting back is what makes a great podcast different.

Prologue Projects/Luminary: Fiasco

Type of podcast: Reporting/Documentary

Episodes listened to: Full season 3 and parts of season 1

Links: Apple | Spotify | Luminary

Fiasco is another pace-setting podcast. Hosted by Leon Neyfakh – who hosted Slow Burn, and who guested once on our podcast A Positive Jam – the show has had three seasons so far, diving into the 2000 election, the Iran-Contra scandal, and in this season, the Boston school segregation/integration crisis of the 1970s. Given its focus on education and integration, it has been mentioned quite a bit alongside Nice White Parents (and The Promise, which I’ll save for next month).

Even more than Nice White Parents, Fiasco poses the question of why a podcast instead of a book? For example, I read J. Anthony Lukas’ Common Ground – only because I heard Leon mention it, to be clear – and that is a fairly authoritative, wide-lens overview and study of this topic. Where else can a podcast go that the book didn’t? This pertains more to historically oriented podcasts like Fiasco or Slow Burn than a currents events-oriented podcast like Nice White Parents, I think.

Some of the immediate answers I come up with are that for some people, it’s just easier or more enjoyable to listen to a narration rather than read it. For others, it is like what I said for Business Wars above – one’s interest in the topic is not quite high enough to buy a book, but can work for a podcast. This was the case for me with the Slow Burn season I listened to on Tupac and Notorious B.I.G.’s murders. And there is something about hearing directly from witnesses and participants in the history. Even though the host is asking questions, and editing conversations, there feels like less between us and the story.

Then there’s a way a podcast host/production team can shape a narrative and put color on it; break it into cliff hangers; and come to a conclusion. I listened to some but not all of season 1 after I listened to season 3 (at a certain point, the 2020 election happened and I couldn’t take any more of the prior fiasco), and there were a couple distinctions to the story telling approach. The narrative tension in season 1 was higher, perhaps because there was a more obvious endgame to that election (even if we know what happened in hindsight). But also, Neyfakh flashed a little more humor and personality in season 1. It could be that from the vantage point of 2019 (when that season came out), even though the political stakes of the 2000 election seem on paper higher, the evident absurdity of those weeks allowed for more humor. Whereas the racial issues in this season echo more directly with what was going on this summer in the U.S., and are harder to ironize or laugh at anyway.

Season 3 ends with a look at Joe Biden’s role in killing the busing movement, but also points a finger at the media/oneself over whether the focus on the conflicts of school desegregation obscured the real successes that the movement had. It’s not that you can’t make that point in a book, but the drawing out of the narrative to reach that sort of conclusion may be more effective or heartfelt in this format.

All these are side issues, really, because there’s something about listening to a story that’s different and, when done right, much better. Episode 6 breaks down the famous photo, the Soiling of Old Glory, and the story behind it. Ted Landsmark, the man being attacked in the photo, is the main speaker on the episode. His perspective and the thoughtful way he shares it is one highlight, and the show brings us through the ins and outs of that day and the fall-out effectively.

The episode is framed with the U.S. bicentennial celebration. Landsmark was attacked on April 5, 1976, three months before the bicentennial almost to the day. It was two weeks before Patriots Day, a celebration of the battle of Lexington and Concord marked by a day off from school, the Red Sox playing at 11am, and the Boston Marathon. It’s no surprise that the bicentennial was a big deal in Boston, and Neyfakh starts the episode with the preparations and Boston’s plans to capitalize on tourist interest. The stain of the desegregation crisis, made most visible by the linked photo, looms as a threat in the background of Landsmark’s story, and a reminder of how much economics and money drive our broader thinking.

And then the ending comes, the Boston Pops are playing by the Charles River, Walter Cronkite is narrating, it’s the 1812 overture where they shoot the cannons. It’s a scene you can just picture even if you didn’t grow up in Boston, the cheering, the crowds. But you don’t picture it exactly, because you’re listening. And that withholding is what makes the last line of the episode so powerful. I’ve waxed on enough here, but when I listened back to this, knowing what was coming, it still almost brought me to tears.

Film Nation Entertainment/Neon Hum Media: Murder on the Towpath

Type of Podcast: Reporting/Documentary/Storytelling

Episodes listened to: Full season (8 episodes)

Link: Luminary

Fiasco is on Luminary so I paid for a month, and while I had access I listened to Murder on the Towpath as well. Hosted by Soledad O’Brien, this is positioned somewhere between the classic true crime podcast from Serial and the historical deep dives of a Fiasco or a Slow Burn. The show is about the murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer (true crime) but also the Kennedy assassination and conspiracy theories, and about civil rights and the story of an unheralded pioneer, Dovey Roundtree.

The podcast is very well done. I’m a fan of O’Brien’s voice, and she’s even a little more proactive in bringing her own perspective into the story than Joffe Walt. I noticed as a production or writing thing, this podcast is a bit wordier, with less space for air or for beats to land, whether of the script or of the music (and it’s another show with very good music).

To come back to ‘why is this a podcast’ theme, this was a story that fit my ‘mild interest but then it hooks me’ framework. It also, especially (again) towards the end exemplifies the ability of a podcast to craft an ending that feels more personal. O’Brien delves into the legacies of the two women at the heart of the show. I can see this working reasonably well as a video documentary, so I won’t get more argumentative about it as a podcast. It works as a podcast, that’s all.

***

This went longer than I planned, really, so I’m going to hold one podcast over to next month, which will be on time. Any thoughts on these podcasts or what does/doesn’t work, let me know in comments or at daniel at shortmanstudios.com, would love to hear from you.

The end of my summer included an eight-hour road trip and then a decent amount of driving while on my vacation. I also started going to the gym again. All of that means my podcast listening time increased. Which means I have a few extra podcasts to review this week.

I listened to a mix of bigger-name podcasts and more ‘indie’ podcasts, and dove into a few music podcasts given our continued focus there for A Positive Jam, as well as one investment podcast that is a blue-chipper. For the review format, I’m adding which episodes I listened to that constitute the review.

Gimlet – How To Save A Planet

Type of podcast: Interview/Conversation/Reporting

Episodes listened to: #1 and #2

Links: Apple | Spotify

Gimlet is a leading podcast studio, one of Spotify’s big acquisitions. I don’t know their gamut of podcasts well enough to say, but I follow one of the writers for this podcast and it seems to me that How To Save A Planet was a big launch. It gets prominence in the PocketCasts app, for example, and the CEO and cofounder of Gimlet (Alex Blumberg) is one of the hosts, along with a leading climate policy expert and do-it-all, Dr. Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson. So it’s both worth listening to for what they’re saying about an important topic and to consider their choices from a podcasting perspective.

The biggest thing I’ve noticed from the first two episodes as far as structure is that this blends different podcasting styles in an interesting way. I don’t mean to oversell my categorization of podcasting types, as many podcasts mix up their approach, but How To Save A Planet does so in a new way, to me.

The hosts are very conversational, and have an easy, likable rapport that pulls the listener in – though I am looking forward to when the ‘hey, we have a podcast!’ bits fade out. They also feature interviews though; the hosts interview key guests or the reporters on the team, and those reporters are speaking with people in the field. Which is the third element, of course, the reporting and story-telling element.

Each of the first two episodes tells a story, one about the rise of wind-powered energy in the US and the challenges and opportunities therein, and one about the adoption of the Green New Deal framework in Europe. They use the episode – about 40 minutes in length – to organize a full example or picture of an aspect of the climate change economy and challenge.

The other big choice they make is to end each episode with a call to action, or more specifically offer ways for listeners to get involved in response to the episode’s topic. Theoretically, this crosses some sort of journalistic line. I don’t come from a full journalism background, and in the current subjective vs. objective debate old distinctions have been challenged if not blurred, but it seems that if there’s any topic worthy of a more advocacy-driven approach, it’s climate change. So I think it’s a nice touch.

There’s also a potential dissonance in how conversational and light the back and forth between the hosts can be, given the weight of the topic, but that’s probably also deliberate. That lightness makes it enjoyable to listen and is likely to keep listeners coming back, while still delivering the unvarnished facts of the world’s ill health.

(Small thing for podcasters to take comfort in – episode one features a Zoom robot glitch, which happens sometimes when recording. If it can slip through on a Spotify/Gimlet show, it can happen to anyone!)

Emily Harris and Andrew Rinard.- Get Offset

Type of podcast: Conversational/Interview

Episodes listened to- #45 and #74

Links: Apple | Spotify

Get Offset focuses on music, with a prism of music gear as a starting point. It’s a smart way to differentiate, and while I am a total gear noob, they seem to know their stuff. I listened because someone on twitter introduced us to this given their Hold Steady fandom (full disclosure: we’re hoping to have Emily join us on A Positive Jam). I listened to both their Hold Steady interviews. They take their time building up a flow with the guest, and then get to some really interesting points about touring, or in the second episode’s case – recorded with Hold Steady guitarist Steve Selvidge at the beginning of the pandemic – over the state of the music industry as lockdowns were beginning. I did not hear much about cats, but cats is apparently a side-focus for the podcast which I wholeheartedly endorse.

Slate – Slow Burn

Type of podcast: Documentary

Episodes listened to – all of Season 3

Links: Apple | Spotify

Slow Burn is another one of those podcasts that almost defines the medium. (As a disclosure, the host of the first two seasons, Leon Neyfakh, guests on A Positive Jam this week.) I listened to season 2 a few months ago, and had dabbled in season 3 previously but dove back in over my vacation.

Season 3 covers the rise and fall of Tupac Shakur and the Notorious B.I.G. Similar to Season 2 on the Clinton Impeachment, it’s set in the 90s, which is when I grew up. So the stories were both part of my youth but never fully understood, though the Clinton impeachment has stayed more relevant to me as an adult, and so a little more familiar.

The story itself is great but it’s also worth paying attention to the choices the team makes in how they tell that story. For Season 3, starting in media res with the shooting of Tupac at Quad City Studios both grabs attention and pinpoints the start of the east coast vs. west coast rap battles. The story ends unresolved, but given there’s no findings of who killed either rapper, how else could the story end?

I thought the episode focusing on Dolores Tucker’s crusade against rap lyrics to be an interesting digression from the main plot of the season. I think they wove it in well enough to the season, and it also echoed the episode that focused on gangster rap and the police. I’m wondering if there could have been more reflection or analysis, in retrospect, on Tupac’s evolution from being a feminist to one who appeared to be proudly misogynistic. And I wonder if a little more could have been done to analyze his and Biggie’s motivations and responsibility for all of this – I walked away thinking Tupac was a little less than he was purported to be, and also a hothead who aggravated his circumstances. I don’t think I’m supposed to walk away with that, and a little more context would have been helpful.

That said, I think these podcast series that look at recent past events, whether they be Floodlines, Fiasco (Neyfakh’s new podcast), or the more political focused seasons of Slow Burn, are never going to be able to cover all aspects of the story. They scratch the memory and nostalgia itch, and for those who want to dive deeper, they provide questions and resources so you can dig in. At least, that’s how I’m thinking about it.

(And as a quick thing, Slate’s monetization model is ads plus bonus episodes as part of their membership program – I suppose those bonus episodes would be a way to dive deeper as well. Also a quirk – in Spain I usually don’t get ads from shows hosted on Megaphone, which allows for dynamic ad targeting and, for the US shows I listen to, is usually targeted at the US audience. For whatever reason, all the ads showed up in the last episode).

My-T-Sharp Network – Our Favorite Sings

Type of podcast: Conversational

Episodes listened to: #17 and #18

Links: Apple | Spotify

I came across this while looking for music podcasts, probably on Spotify. There was a two-parter available on the Blues Brothers, a movie I only first watched maybe last summer. I didn’t totally get it; I liked it, but it didn’t appear to me as that classic. That made this two-parter podcast a good place to start..

Our Favorite Sings has great banter, as a starter. It took the hosts Monty and Tiffany about 10-15 minutes to even get to the Blues Brothers, and I didn’t know a lot of the artists they were talking about in the run-up, but their teasing one another and their enthusiasm kept me hooked and laughing. And then when they got to the Blues Brothers, they did a very good job of balancing their personal experience with the subject matter itself. I never thought about the fact that Blues Brothers would of course be playing on WGN whenever there was a hole in the programming (along with Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, I imagine?). And I knew some of the musician cameos in the movie, of course, but missed a few. In any case, they shed light on the movie and their conversation was enjoyable. I plan to check out a couple more episodes when I have the chance.

Podium Podcast – Igor El Ruso

Type of Podcast: Documentary

Episodes listened to: all five

Links: Apple | Spotify

Podium Podcast is the leading podcast studio in Spain. The charts in Spain are filled with their podcasts as well as radio stations – La Cadena Sur, OndaCero, esRadio – and then a few Spotify Studios podcasts and English language podcasts. So as far as dedicated podcast studios go, they don’t have much competition.

I had previously tried listening to Valencia Destroy, a podcast about the famous Ruta del Bakalao and the music/drug scene on the Valencian coast in the 80s-90s, but I haven’t been able to get past episode 2, mostly due to my own Spanish skills. I’ve also sampled some of their non-documentary podcasts. Igor El Ruso is only a five-part series, and it was more digestible.

Igor El Ruso is the pseudonym for Norbert Feher, a Serbian born near the Hungarian border. He went from petty crime to murder, first in Italy and then in the Aragon region in Spain. The podcast takes us through his story in a fairly classic true-crime way. We hear about his upbringing, we hear from Italian experts and former prisonmates, and we hear how he hid himself in ‘España vacia’, the term for much of the middle of the country that has been depopulated as people head to the cities over the past decades.

The story is well told and well produced, with perhaps a little bit too many sound effects to accentuate the narration. I had trouble understanding some of the interviewees, but that could have been my car audio or my Spanish listening skills rather than the production. I liked the podcast, but the thing I was left asking is what is the ‘so what?’ Why does this matter? It could be that because I’m not fully immersed in Spanish media and day-to-day affairs, I’m just missing that this is self-evident, as important as say the Tupac/Biggie killings covered on Slow Burn. But from listening, the closest I got was that the government was too slow to act, which may be a sign of the neglect in these empty parts of Spain. Whether that was the case or something else, I think the producers and the host, Patricia Peiró, could have hammered this home a little more.

That said, there’s every chance I missed it, and the podcast was enjoyable and well done in any case.

Patrick O’Shaughnessy – Invest Like The Best

Type of podcast: Interview

Episode listened to: Katrina Lake

Links: Apple | Spotify

Invest Like The Best is the investing interview podcast. Patrick O’Shaughnessy always comes prepared and is genuinely interested in his guests. He does a good job listening and responding to the conversation, and there are enough standard touches – his closing question, the production at the beginning, repeat guests, and the way he connects conversations – to provide familiarity to listeners. I listened to an interview with Stitch Fix CEO Katrina Lake, someone I admire in the business world, and learned quite a bit from the conversation.

The conversation made me think and spurred me to action in my investing – in the sense of thinking through what I want to do with my investing, I mean, not a straight buy/sell thing – which is about all you can hope for from a show like this, along with an enjoyable conversation.

The Detroit History Podcast

Type of Podcast: Storytelling

Episodes listened to: Season 1, episodes 1-7

Links: Apple | Spotify

I’ve always had a soft spot for Detroit, one that grew when I met/dated/married a Michigander, and one that grew more when I realized that there’s a gulf between where she’s from – West Michigan – and the Motor City, a gulf that extends beyond the four hours it takes to drive there. I love cities and love thinking through the life cycle of a city, and cheer for cities with rich cultural histories that are trying to get on the upswing. New Orleans and Detroit, I often say, are the two cities I’d most like to live in if I lived in the states.

So when I became aware of this podcast, because I follow a Detroit historian (Tom Sugrue) who retweeted it at some point, I knew I’d be interested. And in finally listening, I think it’s delivered so far. Each episode is about 20 minutes, allowing enough space to tell a distinct story about the city. Host Tim Kiska tells it straight – and has a great Michigan accent to boot. It will be interesting to see how well he does in representing the diversity of Detroit, a very Black city but also with a ton of different people that have crossed through it. It’s also a city that has often had stuff to come back from, and so it can be hard to tell a positive story without coming off like a booster.

Through the first 7+ episodes (from 2017/2018), I think the show hits the right notes. There’s a bit of a boomer perspective – five of those seven episodes take place in that time period, and two are about the beginning of the 20^th century. At the same time, they are interesting nuggets on those periods – about Coleman Young’s testifying before the House of Un-American Activities Committee, or the Detroit Red Wings of the 1950s and the first woman executive of a US sports team. And the 8^th episode, which I listened to but with only half a mind, is about the Arab American community in Dearborn and the Detroit area, which points to the show seeking to be representative. I’m learning and enjoying the episodes, and especially enjoy Kiska’s pronunciation of Ossip Gabrilowitsch. That episode, on the building of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra and Orchestra Hall, really encapsulates the show’s approach, and I got a lot out of it.

She Will Rock You

Type of Podcast: Conversational

Episode listened to: #24

Links: Apple | Spotify

This is another one of the music podcasts I came across, and one of the more enjoyable ones. Two women review a classic rock (in the broader sense of classic rock) band’s career. I am guessing they are in their mid to late 20s, maybe early 30s, and so they’re coming at these bands fairly fresh, which makes for a fun perspective. It’s not far from the two teenage brothers on youtube listening to old songs for the first time.

I listened to their episode on Rage against the Machine. First, I laughed out loud at the non-sequitur intro about Taco Bell. And then the discussion about Rage and how ‘these bros’ were revolutionaries was fun. I’m not a huge Rage fan but knew enough to follow along, and I thought they hit key elements of the band’s trajectory. Basic research along with personality from the hosts can go a long way in podcasting.

Lukewarm Tallboy Studios – Bend & Scoop

Type of podcast: Music / Interview

Episodes: Various

Links: Apple

I first became aware of/started ‘podcasting’ in the mid-00’s. I put that in quotes because what we did at 30music.com was compile monthly mixtapes, which we would share on the site as an mp3. I don’t remember us actually being on Apple podcasts, and Spotify had not even been invented yet, but the concept was simple: share our favorite new songs from the month or the year.

Bend & Scoop is one of a few podcasts I’ve learned about recently that is bringing that mixtape style back. Bob Bland, the host, pulls together a few movie clips for the intro (I believe the title of the podcast is a Cheech & Chong quote), classic radio jingles for transitions, and explains which songs you are hearing. The music trends towards a variety of indie rock, including many bands I haven’t heard of, so it’s a cool way of raising their profile and an enjoyable mix.

He’s also recently started adding an interview segment at the end of episodes, called ‘is that your vinyl answer’, where he brings on another podcaster as a guest to talk about their vinyl collection and music in general, as a way of promoting the vinyl record store industry, which is cool. Full disclosure – I am appearing as a guest on this week’s episode, I believe. But I think this is an example of an organic podcast bringing good energy to the world, good stuff.